ChevronToxico

Chevron Facing Multi-Billion Dollar Liability as Landmark Environmental Lawsuit Nears End

Chevron Management Must Inform Investors, Prepare for Possible "Rainforest Chernobyl" Judgment

Amazon Watch

Amazon Watch
24 April 2007 - FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: Paul Paz y MiƱo: +1 510.281.9020 x302, paz@amazonwatch.org


San Francisco, CA - The lead lawyer in the landmark environmental lawsuit against Chevron in Ecuador is in California to warn that the oil major has failed to prepare for a possible multi-billion dollar damages bill within the coming months.

Speaking ahead of Chevron's annual shareholder meeting on Wednesday, Pablo Fajardo, who represents 30,000 plaintiffs in the class-action lawsuit, stressed that a judgment was now likely in early 2008. "After years of litigating, it is fantastic news that the end of this court-case is now in sight," said Mr. Fajardo, during his first visit to California, the home state of the San Ramon-based oil giant. "I don't wish to prejudge the court's decision but the scientific evidence against Chevron heard at trial has been overwhelming."

Meanwhile, environmental group Amazon Watch warned that Chevron had broken SEC regulations by misrepresenting that evidence. Amazon Watch Executive Director Atossa Soltani said: "Chevron shareholders need to know that Chevron is now on the brink of being ordered to pay for an environmental remediation that has been provisionally costed at $6 billion.

"Mr. O'Reilly has failed in his fiduciary responsibilities and in his insistence on fighting a losing case tooth-and-nail. Every site inspected by the court that Texaco (now Chevron) operated in the Ecuadorian Amazon is polluted. Concentrations of toxic contaminants have been found to be hundreds and thousands of times higher than permitted by Ecuadorian law. Chevron's legal defense doesn't have a leg to stand on."

During three decades of drilling for oil in an inhabited area of the Ecuadorian Amazon, Chevron allegedly dumped more than 18 billion gallons of toxic by-products from the drilling process directly into rivers and streams, on which local families depend. That waste contained 30 times more crude than the Exxon Valdez spill, prompting local communities, racked by cancers and other health problems, to sue Chevron in 2003. Now, after four years, the judge has rejected Chevron's complaints and fast-tracked the David-and-Goliath trial to finish hearing evidence by the end of July. A judgment, which could see Chevron being ordered to pay one of the largest damage awards in civil history, is expected in early 2008.

Chevron's handling of the case has landed the oil major in hot water in both Ecuador and the US. Here, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has been investigating Chevron over its failure to disclose details of the court-case in its 10k and other financial filings. Meanwhile, in Ecuador, Chevron is facing a potential criminal investigation resulting from a complaint by Luis Macas, a national indigenous leader and former presidential candidate.

Atossa Soltani, Amazon Watch Executive Director, said: "There is a huge question mark hanging over the head of Mr. O'Reilly. The strategy he spearheaded to deal with Chevron's Ecuador disaster has been a moral, legal and corporate failure. Chevron management urgently need to devise a strategy to deal with the potential bill and the damage to the corporation's reputation as a result of the mismanagement and misrepresentation around this lawsuit. That is the least shareholders should now expect."

[ Back to top ]